Give
Up Tomorrow is a documentary that tells the story of how Paco Larrañaga was wrongfully convicted
and sent to prison for a crime he did not commit. Producer Marty Syjuco reveals
the making of that documentary and how first-time filmmakers beat the odds to bring
Paco’s plight known to the world.
Film poster of Give Up Tomorrow |
Filmmakers Marty Syjuco and Michael
Collins already had an ending in mind when they first embarked on the project
that would eventually become the documentary Give Up Tomorrow. It was the image of Francisco “Paco” Larrañaga being
released from prison, finally a free man. They imagined him being able to travel
with them as they screened the film in festivals around the world, answering
questions and sharing his story to curious viewers.
This would not be the case. Fifteen years
since he was arrested for the kidnap, rape and murder of Marijoy and Jacqueline
Chiong, Paco is still behind bars. The now 35-year-old has only seen Give Up Tomorrow once, when the filmmakers
were invited to the San Sebastian Human Rights Film Festival in Spain earlier
this year.
“Next to bringing the film home and
showing it at Cinemalaya, this was the most crucial screening,” Syjuco says.
“Because that’s where he is.” Amazingly, Paco was given permission to attend
the film showing. Over 600 people saw the documentary at the beautiful Victoria
Eugenia Theater, a converted opera house. In the audience were the warden and
authorities of the prison where Paco was being held.
“They had heard about
Paco’s case and claims of innocence, but I imagine they deal with a lot of
prisoners who say they are innocent. But after watching it, they came to that
conclusion themselves, and finally understood [the case]. They realized that it
was a wrongful conviction. After that, they started treating him better. They
no longer require him to admit his guilt as part of the process for parole. Because
in a system that works, you’re in prison because you’re guilty [of something].
And so as part of restorative justice you have to admit guilt. But there’s no
rule for the innocents in jail.”
Just the Facts
People have always expressed outrage over
the conviction of Paco Larrañaga and seven of his co-accused, but never has the
indignation been more pronounced and the severity of the injustice more
understood than until after Give Up
Tomorrow was released. An issue that was slowly disappearing into the mists
of history was suddenly thrust back into public consciousness and given new life
through a film that urges viewers to rethink what they know about the case.
The documentary is the first effort of
producer-director tandem Syjuco and Collins. Syjuco is related by affinity to
Paco; his brother Jaime is married to Paco’s sister Mimi. There’s no way to
skirt around the implied bias, but the filmmaker has always been upfront about
the connection, even electing to place a disclaimer in the film’s credits to further
illustrate that his intentions go well beyond filial obligations. “We wanted
people to form their own opinions,” he says. “There were so many rumors and so
much speculation, so we decided to just stick to the facts.”
Syjuco was born in Manila but migrated to
Canada when he was seven years old. He came back to the Philippines in the
early 90s and finished college in De La Salle University, after which he studied
film in New York in 2000. He took a job
at Focus Features where he learned the business aspect of filmmaking, including
booking and distribution.
“I felt guilty that I never got involved
before,” he says. “I followed [the case] from a distance. I was living in
Manila then, going to school, partying. I was in wrapped up in my own world. It
was really only when I moved away that I matured, and when I started to be more
aware of the world around me.”
That awareness included the case
involving Paco, who was 19 years old when he was arrested in Manila for a crime
that happened 565 kilometers away in the island of Cebu. Syjuco had never
really met Paco before but knew of his not-so-favorable reputation in the
Southern city for isolated incidents of youthful indiscretions. The filmmaker says
he was inspired to “do something” when the Supreme Court sentenced Paco to
death by lethal injection in 2004. That court decision elevated the double life
imprisonment handed down by a Cebu court in 1999.
“This was happening to my brother’s
wife’s family,” Syjuco says. “It was devastating for them. I never really
understood. Of course I knew Paco wasn’t in Cebu [when the crime happened], and
people told me he was innocent. But I didn’t know firsthand. It was only through
the course of making this film, when we conducted our own investigation, spoke
to the witnesses and interviewed over 100 participants [involved in the case],
that we came to our own conclusion. There’s no way that Paco could have done
it. And not only Paco, but the others as well. They were innocent and they were
all framed.”
Inside Prison Walls
Armed with a desire to right a grave
wrong, Syjuco and his filmmaking partner Collins set out to make the documentary.
But being-first time filmmakers, they needed direction and guidance. They found
these in Ramona Diaz, the person behind the critically acclaimed Imelda. “We were lucky because there
were a lot of Filipino filmmakers in New York at the time,” he says. “Like
Ditsy Carolino, Raymond Lee, Nana Buxani. We had a lot of mentors and friends
who became our advisers. Ramona was especially crucial and generous.”
An old photo of Paco Larraña behind bars (image courtesy of Give Up Tomorrow) |
Syjuco says that in the beginning, it was
a real DIY effort to make the film. The pair invested on a video camera, which
they paid for using their own credit cards, and learned how to operate it on
the plane to Manila for their first shoot. They stayed with family, borrowed
cars and basically got by through “the kindness of friends,” approaching the
project more as investigative journalists than filmmakers. A day after they landed,
they immediately went to see Paco, who was on death row in the New Bilibid
Prisons in Muntinlupa City. There was even a power outage when they went inside
the prison.
“Conditions [there] were terrible,”
Syjuco reminisces. “It was built for 8000, but there are over 20,000 inmates. Death
row was the worst. The [inmates] were not treated well, not even [as] humans.”
The filmmakers knew they had to see Paco and get him to tell his story because
they realized he was never given a voice throughout the trial. He was not
allowed to testify, and neither were his witnesses, who would have said that they
were with Paco in Manila when the crime was taking place in Cebu City.
“It was
important for us to meet him again after many, many years and to spend time
with him. We started visiting regularly. Media coverage [during the trial] was
always very pro-Chiong. Paco’s story was never heard.”
In order to circumvent Bilibid’s
very tough rules on interviewing inmates and filming inside prison walls, the
filmmakers decided to smuggle a camera inside. It was only one of the many
challenges they faced in order to tell Paco’s story.
Persistence
While it was easy to schedule interviews
with Paco’s family and friends, Syjuco knew they would need to get “the other
side” for the documentary to make sense. Surprisingly, it was not that
difficult to gain access to the victims’ mother, Thelma Chiong.
“Mrs. Chiong is
very savvy and seasoned with the camera,” he says. “She’s very sanay (used to it). Basically our
approach was that we were making a documentary film about the case, that we
spent time with Paco and his family, and asked if we could also spend time with
[her].”
Because of the high-profile nature of the case there was a lot of
archival news footage of interviews with Mrs. Chiong. Syjuco gathered as much
news footage as he could and noticed that in interviews, the grieving mother
would start bawling and invoke the memory of her daughters anytime she was
asked a question she didn’t like. “People would back off. We wanted [the chance
to] question her and challenge her.”
While it proved to be easy getting the
Chiong side to talk, the real task, according to Syjuco, was getting access to
the prosecution lawyers and the police involved in the case. “Remember we were
trying to talk to people who were hiding things, and who were possibly
complicit in the frame up. So why would they talk? And so they didn’t.” It was only
through sheer persistence that the filmmakers finally broke through and got the
interviews.
“Many doors were closed, but we would just keep coming back, year
after year. After a while I think they just got tired of us,” Syjuco says with
a smile.
Domino Effect
Slowly, the documentary began to take
shape. Syjuco knew though that in order to make the documentary they wanted,
they would have to work with professionals in the filmmaking process,
particularly editing, and that meant needing serious money. What started out as
guerrilla filmmaking would eventually require a hefty investment from funding agencies.
They learned the process from documentarian Diaz and began writing proposals
and applying for grants.
“As first time filmmakers, we got shot down left and
right,” Syjuco says. “We were constantly discouraged. But whenever we felt that
way we just thought of Paco, how he was spending 10, 12, 15 years in prison,
wrongfully convicted. So we kept at it. We kept developing the treatment and
the narrative and our footage was getting better and better. Until eventually,
we got our first grant, from the Jerome Foundation.” After this, more agencies
started paying attention and soon, they received funding from the likes of
Sundance, the BBC, Tribeca and PBS.
The film’s logistical requirements
necessitated shooting in three continents: Manila and Cebu in the Philippines;
New York and San Francisco (where Paco’s sister Mimi Larrañaga is based) in the
US; and London (where the offices of Amnesty International and Fair Trials
International are located), Madrid and Barcelona in Spain in Europe. Syjuco
reveals that the cost of the whole film is somewhere around P500,000.
“You have
to consider though that the film was made over a span of seven years. Most of
that budget went to editing, because the best editors command such high fees.
It’s really a skill and an underrated craft.”
Sparking the Discussion
Give Up
Tomorrow premiered
at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York in April 2011, where it won the
Audience Award and a Special Jury Mention for Best New Documentary Director.
From there, the film has been screened in more than 50 film festivals around
the world and has won numerous citations and awards, including Best Documentary
at the Anchorage International Film Festival and Audience Awards from the
Sheffield Doc/Fest in the UK, Antenna International Film Festival in Sydney, Australia,
and the Valencia Human Rights Festival and San Sebastian Human Rights Festival,
both in Spain. In the Philippines, the documentary was first screened at the
Cinemalaya Film Festival in July 2012. It has since received a commercial
run in theaters such as the Ayala Malls, Robinsons Galleria and Gateway Cinema,
something rare for a documentary and even rarer for a non-Hollywood production.
Filmmakers Marty Syjuco (left) and Michael Collins (right) with Robert De Niro at the Tribeca Film Festival (photo courtesy of Marty Syjuco) |
“I’m not an activist,” Syjuco says. “I
don’t have the skills or experience to go out and campaign. But this film isn’t
just about Paco, it’s about all of us and our very broken justice system. I’m
hoping that through this documentary, by experiencing the story of Paco, we’ll
realize that there are many other Pacos out there. What about the guy off the
street, the cigarette vendor who was also framed and not given a fair trial, not
given due process and who doesn’t have the means to a proper lawyer or legal
team, but just thrown and rotting away in jail? I’m hoping that this film will
raise those questions and spark that discussion.”
At the same time, Syjuco also believes
that Paco was used as an example by the powers-that-be to demonstrate how
“justice” can and should be meted out to the rich and the privileged. He says
that while it is true that we live in a country where the rich have gotten away
with murder, it’s no reason to punish the truly innocent.
“[Paco] paid for the
sins of so many before him,” he says. “I hope Filipinos will do something,
whether it’s for Paco and the co-accused, for the justice system, and for all
of us.”
“I also know that this isn’t an overnight
thing,” he adds. “It’s going to take time.”
This story originally appeared in the December 2012 issue of Lifestyle Asia magazine
This story originally appeared in the December 2012 issue of Lifestyle Asia magazine
No comments:
Post a Comment